Abbr. / Arctic fishing shelter / Article of furniture on which a plate of oats might be set? / Walk from one coop to another? / Commoner, informally / Teenager’s response to a dad joke / Dirk Nowitzki’s longtime team, to fans

Constructor: Kevin Curry

Relative difficulty: Easy

THEME: Animal “S” shift — familiar compound or two-part terms and phrases involving animals are clued as possessive phrases—that is, you have to mentally take the “S” from the front of the second part of the base answer and affix it (with an apostrophe) to the end of the first part. The wacky possessive phrases are clued wackily (“?”-style):

Theme answers:

• HORSE’S TABLE (17A: Article of furniture on which a plate of oats might be set?) (from “horse stable”)
• DRAGON’S LAYER (23A: Thick, spiked outer covering?) (from … the movie Dragonslayer?)
• PIG’S KIN (37A: Relatives in a sty?) (from “pigskin”)
• CAT’S CAN (39A: “Throne” for a lion king?) (from “CAT scan”)
• CHICKEN’S TRIP (46A: Walk from one coop to another?) (from “chicken strip”)
• TURTLE’S HELL (56A: Being flipped on its back, e.g.?)  (from “turtle shell”)

Word of the Day: DRAGONSLAYER (see 23A) —

Dragonslayer is a 1981 American dark fantasy film directed by Matthew Robbins from a screenplay he co-wrote with Hal Barwood. It stars Peter MacNicol in his feature film debut, Ralph Richardson, John Hallam, and Caitlin Clarke. It was a co-production between Paramount Pictures and Walt Disney Productions, where Paramount handled North American distribution and Disney handled international distribution through Buena Vista International. The story is set in a fictional medieval kingdom where a young wizard encounters challenges as he hunts a dragon, Vermithrax Pejorative.

It is the second joint production between Paramount and Disney, after Popeye (1980), and is more mature than most contemporary Disney films. Because the audience expected the film to be solely children’s entertainment, the violence, adult themes and brief nudity were somewhat controversial, though Disney did not hold the North American distribution rights. The film was rated PG in the U.S. Like The Black Hole (1979), the version of the film broadcast on the Disney Channel was edited to remove two scenes.

The special effects were created at Industrial Light and Magic, the first use of ILM outside of a Lucasfilm production. Phil Tippett had co-developed an animation technique there for The Empire Strikes Back (1980) called go motion, a variation on stop motion. This led to the film’s nomination for the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects, but it lost to Raiders of the Lost Ark, the only other visual effects nominee that year, whose special effects were also provided by ILM. Including the hydraulic 40-foot (12 m) model, the dragon consists of 16 puppets dedicated to flying, crawling, or breathing fire.

The film received generally positive reviews from critics, but it performed poorly at the box office, grossing $14.1 million worldwide against a production budget of $18 million. It was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Original Score, which went to Chariots of Fire. It was nominated for a Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, again given to Raiders of the Lost Ark. (wikipedia)

• • •

If nothing else, this puzzle has inspired me to watch DRAGONSLAYER (1981). Despite being the target audience for this thing (12-year-olds who were into Dungeons & Dragons, Star Wars, and video games), I somehow missed it completely. It came out the same year as Raiders, so I was probably too busy seeing that five or six times. Anyway, 45 years later I think I am in exactly the right frame of mind to watch a movie featuring a puppet dragon called Vermithrax Pejorative. That’s its surname! Pejorative! Amazing. Sounds bad! Anyway, thanks for the time travel, puzzle. Now I’ve got a new movie for my already extensive Watchlist. As for the rest of this puzzle, it seemed rudimentary and dull to me, and lacked a clear conceptual cohesiveness. Why animals? Why is one of the animals imaginary? Why is one of the animals (cat) not an animal at all in its base phrase (CAT scan), while all the other animals remain animals on both sides of the “S” switch? I kept waiting for the revealer that never came—give me a reason to be doing any of this. What’s the gag? The whole “S”-shift thing feels very very Very old-fashioned. Like, I’ve seen variations of this specific kind of wackiness a lot before. Feels very ’90s-coded, this kind of rudimentary wordplay. The clues are trying valiantly to make it all fun—toilets for lions, pig family reunions—but ultimately the wackiness all seemed pretty tepid. And then the fill was bland, with a tired short stuff—LOS LAS ORD ADE ECO EMO etc. The bottom is particularly grim, with a whole stack of things I’d rather not see (a turtle being tortured on top of AD FEES on top of a DESPOT). I would not say this puzzle is “SO LAME,” but then I would never use that phrase since disabled people I knew got me to stop using “lame” as a general pejorative decades ago. Speaking of Pejorative, I gotta wrap this up so I can go watch DRAGONSLAYER! (Actually, I gotta work today, but later, for sure!)

This one was fairly color-by-numbers, right from the jump, with the gimme AÇAI allowing me to toggle to Downs and tick them all off in order. Repeat same thing with MEDUSA. The only resistance today, outside the semi-wacky theme answers, was in the cluing for a handful of the short clues. POWER had a tricky “?” clue (13D: Outlet store?—because an “outlet” is where POWER is “stored”). For some reason CLIPS took me a few crosses to get (46D: Assortment to view on YouTube)—I think of myself as watching videos, not CLIPS (which, to me, are parts of larger filmed things), but … fair enough. Had SLINK before SKULK (33D: Sneak around)—just glad I didn’t write in SNEAK there. Seems like something I’d do, especially if I was going too fast and not really paying attention. Second ORD in the past week, so that’s … bad. Had to wait on the “N” in SNARFS since it could so easily have been SCARFS (44D: Wolfs (down)). But this is all ordinary difficulty—the kind of vagueness and misdirection you might find on any day. Very mild. Mostly this one just seemed boring. Not POOR. Just blah.